Funny Sign Don't Feed The Animals Special Diet Farm, Safari, Zoo - 1.2mm Rigid Plastic 200mm x 150mm

Product Information

The implications of the current study are important for both visitors and meerkats as feeding and trying to touch poses health risks to both the meerkats and visitors [ 3, 5]. Our results suggest “do not feed” signs are effective at reducing feeding but attempts to touch the meerkats were increased due to displacement activity. Although only very small proportions of visitors fed or tried to touch the meerkats, the high visitor numbers experienced by Flamingo Land [ 27] means that seemingly small reductions in the proportion of visitors could represent a high number of visitors whose behaviour would be changed. Based on the mean number of people visiting the enclosure each day during our study, the implementation of “do not feed” signs could prevent over 5 instances of feeding each day. Meyerowitz BE, Chaiken S. The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987 Mar;52(3):500. pmid:3572721 Don't stop feeding the swans". www.henleystandard.co.uk. Archived from the original on 2021-12-26 . Retrieved 2021-12-26.

In the US, early 20th century park management actually encouraged animal feeding. For example, "the feeding of squirrels had been seen as a way to civilize the parks and rechannel the energies of young boys from aggression and vandalism toward compassion and charity." [19] Park rangers once fed bears in front of crowds of tourists. [20] However, with a greater awareness of ecological and other issues, such pro-feeding policies are now viewed as detrimental, [1] [19] [20] [21] and US national parks now actively discourage animal feeding. [22] Serrell B. The evolution of educational graphics in zoos. Environment and Behavior. 1988 Jul;20(4):396–415. The failure to find any effect of sign wording on feeding the meerkats indicates that in combination with the pictogram, that both messages are equally effective. It is also possible, however, that due to the efficacy of signs in reducing the proportion of visitors engaging in this behaviour that there was insufficient variation in the data to find an effect hence a larger scale study may be useful. Future research could also investigate whether implementing signs with wording focused on the negative impacts to the visitors themselves (e.g. being bitten), might be more effective than the wording we used. Feral pigeons are often found in urban public spaces. They are often considered environmental pests, and can transmit diseases such as psittacosis. [11] Deliberate feeding of feral pigeons, though popular, contributes to these problems. [11] National Marine Fisheries Service. "Protect Dolphins Campaign". Archived from the original on 2013-02-25 . Retrieved 2013-07-19.VisitBritain. Annual Survey of Visits to Visitor Attractions: Latest results. 2016. https://www.visitbritain.org/annual-survey-visits-visitor-attractions-latest-results. Dwyer, June (2013). "Do Not Feed the Animals: Do Not Touch: Desire for Wild Animal Companionship in the Twenty-first Century". Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment. 19 (4): 623–644. doi: 10.1093/isle/iss118. Gibson D. The wayfinding handbook: Information design for public places. Princeton Architectural Press; 2009 Feb 4. The degree to which a sign engages the audience can also be affected by its perceived relevance. Previous research outlines the importance of framing the message personally toward the current reader to maximise its relevance [ 14]. Simply using personal pronouns can also make a message more direct and increase its significance to the audience [ 6]. Attitudes and behaviours are most likely to change if readers are illustrated as the audience who will be personally affected by their actions [ 15].

How You Can Help Many people enjoy living near and watching wildlife. You can help keep animals wild by keeping the following tips in mind. In national parks and state parks, feeding animals can result in malnourishment due to inappropriate diet and in disruption of natural hunting or food-gathering behavior. It can also be dangerous to the people doing the feeding. [18] Taylor SM. Understanding processes of informal education: a naturalistic study of visitors to a public aquarium. Dissertation Abstracts International, A (Humanities and Social Sciences). 1987;48(5). Capraro V, Rand DG (2018) Do the right thing: Experimental evidence that preferences for moral behavior, rather than equity and efficiency per se, drive human prosociality. Judgment and Decision Making 13, 99–111. The application of ‘watching’ eyes to messages has been shown to increase prosocial behaviours and adherence to messages prohibiting negative behaviours in a variety of contexts by provoking reputational concerns (e.g. [ 19, 20]). For instance, signs with eyes displaced over 60% of bike theft on a university campus from experimental locations to control locations nearby [ 21]. Another line of research into prosocial behaviour found prosociality in an anonymous, one-shot game to be driven by a preference to do the right thing morally and that this preference to ‘do good’ was as strong as the preference to avoid doing wrong [ 22, 23].Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. "Environmental Status: Sharks and rays: Response: tourism". Archived from the original on 2011-04-11 . Retrieved 2013-07-10. The current study aimed to test the efficacy of “do not feed” signs at deterring zoo visitors from engaging in unauthorised feeding or touching of animals and additionally whether different sign wording and the presence of watching eyes affected their efficacy or the attention they drew from zoo visitors. Covert observations of visitor behaviour surrounding a meerkat enclosure were conducted in the absence or presence of signs with varying wording and imagery. We used four signs with a unique combination of wording and imagery. We predicted, in line with previous findings [ 7], that there would be a significant reduction in feeding when a sign was present compared to absent. Given the specificity of the sign messages to feeding, it was predicted that there would be no significant difference in the levels of trying to touch the meerkats when the sign was present and absent. a b c d Carol A. Heiser. "Feeding Wildlife: Food for Thought" (PDF). Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-05-21 . Retrieved 2013-07-06. Tunnicliffe SD. Why do teachers visit zoos with their pupils?. International Zoo News. 1994;41(5):4–13.

Cantrill JG. Communication and our environment: Categorizing research in environmental advocacy. Journal of Applied Communication Research. 1993 Feb 1;21(1):66–95.

Abstract

Do not feed” signs are one of the oldest forms of signs found in zoos [ 6] and play a vital role in promoting zoo inhabitants’ welfare. An investigation into the efficacy of “do not feed” signs found no difference in levels of feeding between no sign and a simple, instructional sign (“Please do not feed the animals”). However, an explanatory sign (“Please do not feed. These animals are on special diets”) significantly reduced feeding in a monkey exhibit [ 7]. This highlights the need to understand the aspects of sign design that influence the efficacy of the signs. In terms of wording, research suggests that less may be more as signs with fewer words are read by more people while longer signs attract less attention [ 6]. However, once a message has been attended to, even if it is not read carefully, increasing the number of arguments in a message can still increase its persuasiveness [ 8].

Oda R, Niwa Y, Honma A, Hiraishi K. An eye-like painting enhances the expectation of a good reputation. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2011 May 1;32(3):166–71. In Canadian national parks, it is illegal to disturb or feed wildlife, [23] and Parks Canada advises visitors not to leave out "food attractants" such as dirty dishes. [24] Ironically, the "it is unlawful to feed animals" signs may themselves become food attractants for porcupines. [25] Road salt and roadkill may also act as food attractants, and removing roadkill is considered good park management. [26] Marine parks [ edit ] Ross SR, Gillespie KL. Influences on visitor behavior at a modern immersive zoo exhibit. Zoo Biology: Published in affiliation with the American Zoo and Aquarium Association. 2009 Sep;28(5):462–72

What do you find is most effective for this purpose without 1) admitting liability (e.g. do not feed horse as it may bite) or 2) encouraging twisted b*****ds to feed the horses (e.g. horses on special diets and feeding them will make them ill) - yes, sadly such people would see this as an ammusing thing to try so I'd rather not give motive for them to do so! Nettle D, Nott K, Bateson M. ‘Cycle thieves, we are watching you’: Impact of a simple signage intervention against bicycle theft. PloS One. 2012 Dec 12;7(12):e51738. pmid:23251615 Tappin BM, Capraro V (2018) Doing good vs. avoiding bad in prosocial choice: A refined test and extension of the morality preference hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 79, 64–70.